· 1 min read
Collaboration Tax: the struggle is real
“Collaboration Tax”… the struggle is real. And no, this is not one of those tariffs 😅
This is probably one of the least-spoken costs: the cost of bringing alignment across the board. Points to ponder:
- Collaboration Tax is the cost one pays to bring people from multiple fronts to align on the purpose and outcome of an event or project.
- While the outcome (or lack thereof) of misalignment is obvious, the cost of making alignment happen is often overlooked.
- Meeting Proliferation — the effort towards alignment, continuous or otherwise — is a very real challenge that eats into one’s own individual work-block time.
- The less time you spend in your own work-block, the further you are from the work. The further you are from the work, the more “collab-tax” you pay for alignment. It’s a vicious cycle.
How does one break this cycle?
- No agenda → no meeting!
- ELMO-friendly meetings (Enough, Let’s Move On). Set the expectation that ELMOs can be called out, and participants shouldn’t feel offended.
- If there’s pre-read material, please be pre-read.
- Adhere to W.A.I.T. — Why Am I Talking?
- No meeting ends without “What are the next actions?”
Clearly, these are not exhaustive — just recommendations. If you have effective methods for keeping your meetings tight, I’d love to hear them.
P.S. Thanks to Radical Candor for the thought-provoking terms “Collaboration Tax” and “Meeting Proliferation”.
Originally published on LinkedIn ↗